Le 8 mars 2011 23:59, Raphaël Jadot <ashledom...@hodo.fr> a écrit : > 2011/3/8 Balcaen John <balcaen.j...@gmail.com>: >> Le Tuesday 08 March 2011 18:11:11, Per Øyvind Karlsen a écrit : >> [...] >>> Tsktsk, my post probably ends up being labelled as flamebait, troll, too >>> long and boring, biased and what not.. >> [...] >> This list is not write only... >> If you've got personnal problem with dmorgan just send him a personal email i >> don't care, but i guess that ennael wrote 3 hours before this last mail from >> you that mageia seems to have choose rpm.org so maybe we can really close >> this >> subject/thread for now instead of talking again & again about the fantastic >> rpm(5).org feature/upstream/it's a revolution/another apple commercial >> here/etc etc. >> It's just boring... >> > > mm ? > I have not the feeling that it was the subject... i read again... ok > he seems to have a great +1 to rpm5, but i did not see that he wanted > insisted or moan in order we use rpm5... > The mails are hard to read, and long, and very technicals, but what > catched my eyes is some things like > "level of compatibility" between Mageia & rpm5 is far greater than any > other (with > other rpm5 based distros being more compatible with Mageia than Mageia > is with non-rpm5 based distros as well" > So it doesn't mean we have to move to rpm5 for being compatible with > rpm5, so where is the problem ? > > I just wonder, why having discussions about technical things like > adults is impossible ? are rpm.org and rpm5 religions ? > > So if Per Oyvind offers help, unless there are hidden things i do not > understand, and if he can improve rpm.org or compatibility stuff or > whatever, why nobody says "ok, why not, tell us, maybe you could help, > maybe not" Did not find it (at least in this ML) > > Seems it's not the first time, in this mail > https://www.mageia.org/pipermail/mageia-dev/20110109/002024.html > he told "(if interested, I could help assist you on writing something > equivalent for compatibility wrapping similar to what I did in the > past with rpm4compat.h & rpm46compat.h to make ie. URPM able to use > rpm 4.4 & 4.6 api with rpm5, let's say rpm5compat.h or something). > > Whatever you end up doing, don't be afraid of asking or trying to > communicate on, the mutual benefits of collaboration are rather > obvious. <;o) > If not, sorry for imposing." > > This mail had no answer, so what, is this guy a kind of antichrist of > rpm , talking with sugar words and trying to backstab you ? > > And at least, If the question are asked over and over, why is there so > few things in archives about it ? Sure every one knows mageia will not > hurry to go to rpm5 tomorow, and so what ? If some are bored about > some related questions, why not opening a FAQ that explain it, or that > just point to the related archive/topic (which could be this one) ? > > Sorry but I hate people bashing when i don't understand it. So if > there are personal anger, try to get over, or explain and communicate > better. > > > > RJ >
Ok, i can't redo what i have done, so i did not meant that we, mageia people, are bad people that don't listen what Po Karlsen has to say. Just tell... well i want mageia to live long and be a great project, i also like mandriva. I don't want to see people bashing, i want to see adults people, no rants, no anger, no religion war etc. and that's all. RJ