On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:17, Funda Wang <fundaw...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/4/14 Anne nicolas <enn...@mageia.org>: >> Hi there >> >> Following tonight's meeting, we will start one week discussion about >> maintainers policy. Some questions to be discussed: >> >> - shall we have ACL's on svn, submits? >> - what about having co-maintenership or teams? How shall we manage this? >> - what about sensitive packages ? >> ... >> >> Pleas make any comments and proposals we could discus to build it. >> Final decisions will be taken during next packagers meeting (20th of >> april) > > If we are about to stick to subversion, then only maintainer could > submit certain package. Of course, if package don't have maintainer, > then anybody could submit it.
As a maintainer, I would like to be at least notified when someone updates one of my packages > If we will turn to git, then everybody could have his own clone, but > the merge request should be reviewed by maintainer. After merging, > anybody could submit it. The problem is that, we couldn't assure every > package have a valid maintainer. Even if git would make it easier, I think it would in any case be nice for people to be able to upload somewhere changes for review, and for maintainer to easily apply them if correct