On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Pascal Terjan <pter...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:17, Funda Wang <fundaw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2011/4/14 Anne nicolas <enn...@mageia.org>: >>> Hi there >>> >>> Following tonight's meeting, we will start one week discussion about >>> maintainers policy. Some questions to be discussed: >>> >>> - shall we have ACL's on svn, submits? >>> - what about having co-maintenership or teams? How shall we manage this? >>> - what about sensitive packages ? >>> ... >>> >>> Pleas make any comments and proposals we could discus to build it. >>> Final decisions will be taken during next packagers meeting (20th of >>> april) >> >> If we are about to stick to subversion, then only maintainer could >> submit certain package. Of course, if package don't have maintainer, >> then anybody could submit it. > > As a maintainer, I would like to be at least notified when someone > updates one of my packages > >> If we will turn to git, then everybody could have his own clone, but >> the merge request should be reviewed by maintainer. After merging, >> anybody could submit it. The problem is that, we couldn't assure every >> package have a valid maintainer. > > Even if git would make it easier, I think it would in any case be nice > for people to be able to upload somewhere changes for review, and for > maintainer to easily apply them if correct >
The use of reviewboard could be nice for this.