'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 09/06/11 10:40 did gyre and gimble: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote: > >> otoh, perhaps a missing package is also a bugfix... maybe we could >> file bug >> reports for missing packages and go through the updates route... > > Filing bug reports is not a bad idea, even if the new package will go to > backports. Just explain a little why it is important (to fix this in a > stable release). > > We probably need a new "version" in bugzilla because mga1+backports is > basically a new distro. A bug in backports shouldn't be filed against > "1" IMHO.
As I said in my original mail I really don't think backports is the right approach. I'd prefer to have a 3rd party repo than abuse backports to get the missing packages. I think updates would be the right place. Perhaps we can make the submission process check to see if there already exists a package and if not, allow packagers to submit directly to core/updates? That way the first version of the package will make it to updates but subsequent changes will have to go via QA? While the "oops I messed up the first version" problem could happen, it would at least keep the burden on the packager for the majority of cases which is how we want it (from my understanding of the previous messages on this thread). Col -- Colin Guthrie mageia(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]