On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:49:18 +0100, Colin Guthrie <mag...@colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 09/06/11 10:25 did gyre and gimble: > > 2011/6/9 JA Magallón <jamagal...@ono.com>: > >> > >> No need, Cauldron is Cauldron. The only strange thing is that I had > >> heard on other threads that update to Gnome 3 was being discussed, > >> but never realized it had finally agreed on. > > > > Same here, I'm a bit surprised. > > We're on the next cycle now. Quite frankly I'd be stunned (and hugely > disappointed) if we *didn't* have Gnome 3! > > Providing a Gnome2 environment or not is likely the point that need > discussion :D > +1 One question: xps:/etc/X11/wmsession.d# ll total 16 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 131 2011.06.08 11:00 02GNOME -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 116 2011.03.25 00:36 06Xfce -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 177 2011.06.08 11:31 11GNOME3 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 118 2011.02.07 22:12 29drak3d xps:/etc/X11/wmsession.d# rpm -qf * gnome-session-3.0.1-1.mga2 xfce-utils-4.8.1-5.mga1 gnome-shell-3.0.2-1.mga2 drak3d-1.30-1.mga1 What is the difference between bot gnomes ? IE, gnome-session and gnome-shell-session ? Now we don't have gnome 2 (gnome 3 uninstalled almost everything), so ? TIA -- J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()ono!com> \ Winter is coming...