Le mardi 26 juillet 2011 17:48:55, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > Le mardi 26 juillet 2011 12:40:02, Michael Scherer a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > while trying to work on the queue of update needing a push, I noticed > > that almost all of them use a "Release: 0". > > > > Since this has a specific meaning ( ie, used for pre release, or svn > > snapshot ), using this for updates is quite confusing, and I do not see > > the reason for that. > > > > If the goal is to be sure that the software is still upgradable, the > > whole %mkrel stuff should take care of that. And if not, we can rebuild > > in cauldron to increase the release.
Re-reading the last sentence for the third time, I understood it at last : so you suggest that we start with release 1 in updates and systematically bump release in cauldron when it's the case ? Why not if using release 0 is really a problem. By the way, is there a youri-check test that checks that packages in the n-th release don't have a higher version than those in the (n+x)th releases and cauldron ? Best regards Samuel
