Op maandag 05 december 2011 12:15:11 schreef zezinho: > Le lundi 5 décembre 2011 12:12:18, Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > > theorethically, people could make another data packages that is free? no? > > i mean, if the engine is free, it doesn't really make sense to make it > > nonfree... ? > > Yes, but to work for now, the engine package requires the non-free source. > If a user has disabled non-free, he will get an error.
i don't know if this is a bad idea: iirc the error is something like: "can't find data package" or something... imho you can suggest it and put a README.urpmi saying you'll need nonfree data... but perhaps this is a discussion more suited in another place...
