Le lundi 5 décembre 2011 12:21:42, Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > Op maandag 05 december 2011 12:15:11 schreef zezinho: > > Le lundi 5 décembre 2011 12:12:18, Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > > > theorethically, people could make another data packages that is free? > > > no? i mean, if the engine is free, it doesn't really make sense to > > > make it nonfree... ? > > > > Yes, but to work for now, the engine package requires the non-free > > source. If a user has disabled non-free, he will get an error. > > i don't know if this is a bad idea: iirc the error is something like: > "can't find data package" or something... imho you can suggest it and put > a README.urpmi saying you'll need nonfree data... > > but perhaps this is a discussion more suited in another place...
It someone really wants the engine to build its own data (which I doubt), they can still download from the upstream website, so for the vast majority of users (if not 100%!) the engine will be of no use without the data.
