> 1 week ago, anyone who would have upgraded to mga2 with dsniff installed > from mdv would have been in the exact same situation than now, except > nobody cared at all. And the proof that nobody cared is that nobody > pushed the rpm sooner. Would it have been pushed to 1, yes, that would > have breached what we agreed to do. But it was not pushed to 1 ( and I > would say "likely on purpose" ). So the only change with this upload is > for people installing dsniff later. mga1 is not dead yet, so if someone who install mga1 now, could ask for dsniff and that should go to update since it is in mdv2010, right? That could be a problem imho... there always could be one person who upgrade from mdv2010 later...
--
Angelo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
