On 11/01/12 10:54, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
2012/1/11 Marja van Waes<marj...@xs4all.nl>:
On 03/01/12 10:09, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
Hi everyone,
Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?
IMHO the best way in this case here would be a mod written for our
setup, all changes well defined to make it maintainable in a proper
way. Saying this I beg to think again whether the issue justifies all
the time and work.
It would make me very, very happy, does that count a little? If I were sure
that I'd be able to learn how to do it, I would now consider to halve the
time I use for the Bug Squad and Doc Team and start learning.
Why? IMHO this complete issue is going out of proportions. Let's
remember why we *seem to need* this MOD in the first place. And what
will we find? The time-to-edit discussion, again. In the council
meeting where it was decided to have this mod It looked as the best
way to please a disturbing minority request, the more as that same
minority gave the impression that such a MOD could be implemented
within a reasonable time span. As we see now after 8 months, this was
never the case.
I can't talk for that minority, of course. However, I can talk for myself:
In such circumstances it is very possible that I'd agree to do something
to later find out I can't concentrate on the task no matter how hard I try.
I regret it wasn't decided that the people who wanted unlimited edit
time should make the MOD, after which the unlimited edit time would be
implemented. They were going to get what they wanted (the unlimited edit
time), wouldn't that have "given them wings" to do that MOD?
Regards,
Marja
