2012/4/10 simple w8 <simpl...@gmail.com>: > 2012/4/10 Guillaume Rousse <guillomovi...@gmail.com>: >> Le 10/04/2012 22:15, simple w8 a écrit : >> >>> For what i have discussed with rpm and rpm5 developers, if you use a >>> plain require its enough, so adding the same require for scripts is >>> simply unnecessary, and im just relying on what rpm devepers said, now >>> if Mageia has a policy that ignores that its different. >> >> I'd rather say we're not aware of such change. If you can point us to such a >> discussion, it could be a good occasion to revise our habits :) >> >> -- >> BOFH excuse #354: >> >> Chewing gum on /dev/sd3c > > Well that was discussed in irc, so i cant point any URL, but that can > be easily checked if asking any of the current developers that hang at > #rpm.org and/or #rpm
I have revised the specs and here they are attached. Is anyone available that could help me in the mentoring proccess?
bamf.spec
Description: Binary data
indicator-application.spec
Description: Binary data
virtualgl.spec
Description: Binary data
indicator-appmenu.spec
Description: Binary data
libappindicator.spec
Description: Binary data
libindicator.spec
Description: Binary data
bumblebee-ui.spec
Description: Binary data
dkms-acpi_call.spec
Description: Binary data
bumblebee.spec
Description: Binary data
dkms-bbswitch.spec
Description: Binary data
optidesk.spec
Description: Binary data
libbsd.spec
Description: Binary data
