mercoledì 30 maggio 2012 alle 16:38, Johnny A. Solbu ha scritto: > On Wednesday 30 May 2012 16:20, Angelo Naselli wrote: > > If you really mean that you should also remove non-free repositories etc... > > I don't think being a don Quijote is that good... always imho of course. > > They do exactly that. They do not have any non-free repo. They have a policy > that do not allow any non-free software (programs, drivers, firmware etc.) in > their distributions, and they don't have any exceptions. > Some might find this silly and stupid. But they live by the rule that every > software should be Free. If it is not, they will not use it because they > can't do what they want with it. > > My point is just that there really do exist several distributions that do not > allow any non-free software in their repositories. if they don't have any > non-free software there is no point in having an empty non-free repo. The way > Thierry listed the two categories he seemed to suggest that there where no > such distributions.
That's sounds different of course, i thought you referred to us ;)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
