andre999 wrote: [snip] > I see your point. > In most cases, a backport for mga1 would be essentially identical for > mga2 (except package file name and corresponding changes in the spec > file). It would only differ if dependancies differ, which I suspect is > unlikely for wesnoth or most other games, for example. > So this means that for a backport to mga1, we should first do one to mga2. [snip]
No. Cauldron then mga2 then mga1. -- blind Pete Sig goes here...