Hi Joseph, On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:53:04 +0800 Joseph Wang <joequ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking over this page: > > https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Python_policy > > * python-pyp2rpm is undergoing review right now. Once it's in > cauldron, I'd like to > point to that package as something that packagers you should use to > get a first draft > of a spec file, I've been working with the Fedora people so that it > will do both fedora > and mageia naming conventions. > Sounds good. Does it support building for both Python 2.x and Python 3.x (in case both are supported)? > * I'd like to add a rule (which is followed by current packages) that > the prefix "py" should > generally be removed from a package name. For example pyopencl should be > called python-opencl. This is the current convention for packages in mageia. I'm OK with it either way. > > * Also for grouping. I'd like to add a rule that Development/Python > is intended for packages > which provide general development libraries for python, and if the > library fits into an obvious > other category (i.e. python routines for cosmology calculations) those > should go into the > other category. Sounds good. Regards, Shlomi Fish -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Rethinking CPAN - http://shlom.in/rethinking-cpan <mst> I find it’s usually safe to assume that whatever shlomif’s doing, there isn’t a good reason for it. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .