On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:51:06 -0800, Fred Weinhaus wrote: > composite -watermark 20 -gravity southeast -geometry +X+Y southeast > letterA_shade120x45t.png lena.jpg lena_letterA_120x45t_watermark.png
Thanks. Is there any way to improve the whole process? I mean, take a look at the following images: http://imagebin.ca/view/ymn7xNiw.html http://imagebin.ca/view/QpXN5P.html http://imagebin.ca/view/94JeOKm.html which were created by composite -watermark 20 letterA_shade120x45t.png Christmas2.jpg Christmas2-t1.jpg composite -watermark 20 -gravity southwest -geometry +20+30 letterA_shade120x45t.png Christmas2.jpg Christmas2-t2.jpg composite -watermark 20 -gravity southwest -geometry +20+30 letterA_shade120x45t.png lena.jpg lena_sw1.png All of them need some kind of improvement (to me). Comparing lena_sw1.png with gimp's result: http://imagebin.ca/view/mjdVWNU.html one can clearly see the difference. Or maybe I picked the worst spot? This looks better: composite -watermark 20 -gravity southwest -geometry +30+20 letterA_shade120x45t.png lena.jpg lena_sw2.png http://imagebin.ca/view/e5o2WfC2.html But still, I think Christmas2-t?.jpg can use a bit of improvement. I've put the original at http://imagebin.ca/view/T5pA_78C.html Thanks -- Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply) http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/ http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/ _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
