On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 19:10:14 -0700 Ujwal Sathyam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
US> >1. should we have one global "Search results" or several of them? US> > US> > -> probably several as otherwise you wouldn't be able to search US> > for a few things in parallel US> > US> >2. which settings should it use and, in fact, should the virtual US> > folders appear in the tree? US> US> Yes This doesn't make sense without an answer to (1) as well :-) So, let me rephrase it: how many virtual folders should appear in the tree? 0, 1, many? US> > -> the manually created ones probably should, but the dynamic US> > ones like "Search results" shouldn't? and inherit the properties US> > of the folder(s) being searched? US> US> I agree. As this is the only proposal so far, I guess this is what we'll do :-) US> >3. what do we want to use the virtual folders for except for this? US> US> This by itself is a pretty powerful use. I would use it to separate US> my mail from multiple accounts without having to move the mail to US> separate folders. No, it wouldn't allow it. See my reply to Thomas: I propose the 1st kind virtual folders and you need the 2nd kind ones for this. US> > Does anyone see a coherent way to treat virtual folders in M? US> US> I really like the implementation of virtual folders in Evolution. You US> specify search criteria and source folders, and you get a view. I believe Evolution uses the 2nd kind ones, doesn't it? Thanks, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
