On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:35:10 +0200 Xavier Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
XN> VZ> XN> We would need a way to differenciate between 'changing the order' and XN> VZ> XN> 'move somewhere else'. I would favor something like two commands to XN> VZ> XN> 'move up' and 'move down' the folder while keeping the same parent. XN> XN> VZ> But surely just dragging the folder should work as well? I mean, this XN> VZ> seems to be a quite intuitive thing to try and why shouldn't it work? XN> XN> Because if you drag a folder Foo, and release it on folder Bar, it XN> should, IMHO, become a *child* of Bar, not its sibling. Ah, I see. But not really agree :-) IMHO if you drag a folder on a folder which already has children, it should become its child. But if you drop it on a childless folder, it should become just a sibling. At least for the local files this should work quite well (as you won't want to have any hcildren under an existing MBOX anyhow). For the IMAP it's slightly more complicated as you might really want to drop a folder under an existing childless one. In the worst/simplest case we could, of course, just ask the user if he wants to put the folder alongside or under the drop target. In the simple cases (like with MBOXes) the program could decide itself, but in any case the user is supposed to know what he is doing ;-) Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
