[I'm cc'ing to the list because of the question at the end] On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:18:21 +0200 Pierre-Yves LE DIRACH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PLD> - are the accelerators (key bindings, like those "&Find"...) created PLD> dynamically by parsing the text string, or is it defined elsewhere in PLD> your code ?? No, the accelerators are part of the string itself, i.e. you should try to choose them in a logical (from French point of view) way but also make sure there are no duplicate accelerators. PLD> (remember, I don(t have access to the soruce code via PLD> CVS. Which start to be annoying, for I often miss the context). You can browse the cvs without having to download anything (follow the link from http://mahogany.sf.net/download.html or direct one from the SF project page). And, of course, you can also checkout the sources if you want to! PLD> In other words, cand I bind them to another letter (the "&Find" PLD> example would then be "&Rechercher"), Yes, of course. PLD> or do I use the M$ Word solution PLD> and explicitely indicate the accelerator ( lie "Rechercher (CTRL+F)" ? But this is something completely different. This is a real accelerator (what we called with this word before would be better called "hot key"). I don't know if we should translate the accelerators like this. I think we shouldn't but I can't really justify it. What do the others think? In any case, this is quite independent of the question above. I.e. whether an item has Ctrl-F or not doesn't change the fact that it should also have a hot key. Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- In remembrance www.osdn.com/911/ _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
