On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 00:39:10 +0100 (CET) Michele Ravani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MR> Would this be correct? MR> SSL_DEF( int, SSL_get_error, (SSL *s, int ret_code), () ); MR> SSL_DEF( X509 *, SSL_get_peer_certificate, (SSL *s), () ); No. It compiles with SSL_DEF( int, SSL_get_error, (SSL *s, int ret_code), (s, ret_code) ); SSL_DEF( X509 *, SSL_get_peer_certificate, (SSL *s), (s) ); and SSL_DEF(SSL_METHOD *, TLSv1_client_method, (void), () ); but I am not completely sure if this is semantically correct. Let me know if it is and I'll commit. -- Michele Ravani [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Those who live hoping, die singing" My Gran ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
