On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 14:24:49 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  I like to see what goes on just to b sure that there are no legitimate
> messages falsely recognized as spam, but the problem is not here: the

I can add option that controls it.

> trouble is that the subject is hidden for non spam messages as well. E.g.:
> this is what I have in the log for this message (manually wrapped):
> 
>       Status: Filtering message 1/1 (from (hidden in spam filter) about
>               '(hidden in spam filter)') - moved to Sunset/IMAP/Mahogany

Hmm, filtering status should include subject/sender if the message is not
spam. I have to look into it.

> And I don't understand how can this work, you don't know whether the
> message is spam or not before filtering it.

But you do know whether spam filter is used or not. We could update
progress dialog *after* filtering. Then it would be clear whether it is
spam. It would also make spam status visible, which currently just flickers
through. But this cannot be applied to folder opening. Maybe subject could
be base64 encoded in logs for debugging purposes.

> I think this change should be
> reversed... If you don't see these messages at all it could be better to
> have "silent filters" option.

This would (1) hide subjects in non-spam filters, (2) it would show
subjects while opening folder that is going to be filtered, (3) it would
have unreasonable default: show, and (4) it wouldn't be used for anything
else, so why generalize it.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Mahogany-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers

Reply via email to