On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:54:51 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Finneid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TF> I was thinking about the same thing some time back ago. What stopped me was TF> that I needed to understand the profile class/system first. I am slowly TF> coming along with that. The details of this can seem complicated but the basic idea is really very, very simple: each folder in the folder tree has its own profile which inherits from its parent (i.e. uses the parents profile values for the values not explicitly set for the folder itself). TF> The gui approach I was thinking of, was that it was specified in the folders own TF> identity property. But it could be done the way you are suggesting aswell, TF> all though al little more complicated perhaps. I'm not sure though. Any TF> thoughts on which is better? I think that, from a user point of view, it makes sense to set the identity for the folder and so, naturally, this should be done in the "Identity" page of the "Folder properties" dialog. To be honest, I don't quite understand what alternative do you propose? Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Access Your PC Securely with GoToMyPC. Try Free Now https://www.gotomypc.com/s/OSND/DD _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
