Yeah I tried a load test with and without and saw virtually zero difference in run time.
Returning briefly to the issue of optimization -- would still somehow like to work in ProGuard. Certainly a subset of its optimizations would not even interfere with debugging symbols. For instance, if you're only doing, say, loop unrolling and peephole-style optimizations, should be no reason that messes with the line number table. On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Robin Anil<robin.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > Could you check it on a computation intensive task in CF
