On Sep 4, 2009, at 6:03 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
Yeah I tried a load test with and without and saw virtually zero difference in run time. Returning briefly to the issue of optimization -- would still somehow like to work in ProGuard. Certainly a subset of its optimizations would not even interfere with debugging symbols. For instance, if you're only doing, say, loop unrolling and peephole-style optimizations, should be no reason that messes with the line number table.
It might be worth asking on legal-disc...@. While Proguard itself is GPL, it says the resulting output can still be whatever you want. We could always ship two versions.