No I don't hear anyone wanting to make equals() ignore the name.
(Otherwise, hashCode() would have to ignore it as well.)

JIRA also seems pretty laggy to me.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we are not going to break the contract between equals() and hashCode(),
> and we're having equals() *only* take into account the mathematical contents
> and the name, then I'd say what we need to do is implement hashCode() in a
> top level class like AbstractVector.
>
> (Is something funny going on with JIRA?  Seems broken...)

Reply via email to