(PS yeah that was my fault for misreading the original message.)
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Sep 30, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Jake Mannix wrote: > >> I didn't say that equals() should ignore name, I said the opposite - >> equals >> and >> hashCode() should *only* take into account the contents and the name, and >> not >> implementation (which means that hashCode() needs to stay in one place and >> not get monkeyed with in subclasses. >> > > Right, that is my understanding
