Btw... the other think that the HashVector does better is inserts. The sorted vector could do much better on average if it deferred sorting until an access or iteration was done. Even iteration doesn't necessarily need sorting, but it could by seen as part of the contract.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I added the "trying to find..." part of the debug output because I > couldn't > figure out what IntDoubleHash was "impossibly confused" about. > > Unfortunately, seeing what it was confused about only confused *me* about > why it was impossible. > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It indicates a bug in the code or in the writer's head. > > > > You are correct about the intent. The default value (which should > probably > > just be 0) should be returned if the value is missing. > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Grant Ingersoll (JIRA) <j...@apache.org > > >wrote: > > > > > I don't think this is "impossible confusion", it's just simply supposed > > to > > > return a 0 when it can't find the index, right? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ted Dunning, CTO > > DeepDyve > > > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve
