Do everyone has to nominate. Wouldn't the other thread alone do? Or am I not
understanding an apache practice here?

Robin

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am confused.
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I also would like to accept the votes on the other thread as if they were
>> on
>> this thread (or conversely, apply the process from this thread to the
>> other)
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org
>> >wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On Mar 15, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> >
>> > > I would like to nominate Sean Owen as Chair of the Mahout PMC.
>> > >
>> > > I suggest the following process for this election.
>> > >
>> > > We should allow other nominations for 2 days until noon March 17 PDT.
>>  If
>> > no
>> > > other nominations have been entered by then, we should consider Sean
>> > elected
>> > > by acclamation.  If other nominations have been posted to this list by
>> > then,
>> > > we should immediately hold a 3 day vote by the Mahout committers to
>> > conclude
>> > > Saturday March 20 at noon PDT.   Since this is a procedural vote, a
>> > majority
>> > > vote of committers will suffice for election and only positive votes
>> for
>> > a
>> > > properly nominated candidate will be considered.
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Grant Ingersoll <
>> gsing...@apache.org
>> > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> OK, seems I was wrong on this and that we do need to nominate/elect
>> > someone
>> > >> and make it part of the resolution.   Please start a separate thread
>> > with
>> > >> [NOMINATION] XXXXX as the subject line.  Please note, I am not
>> > interested in
>> > >> being the PMC Chair at this point, so I will not accept a nomination.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to