Do everyone has to nominate. Wouldn't the other thread alone do? Or am I not understanding an apache practice here?
Robin On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am confused. > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I also would like to accept the votes on the other thread as if they were >> on >> this thread (or conversely, apply the process from this thread to the >> other) >> >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org >> >wrote: >> >> > >> > On Mar 15, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> > >> > > I would like to nominate Sean Owen as Chair of the Mahout PMC. >> > > >> > > I suggest the following process for this election. >> > > >> > > We should allow other nominations for 2 days until noon March 17 PDT. >> If >> > no >> > > other nominations have been entered by then, we should consider Sean >> > elected >> > > by acclamation. If other nominations have been posted to this list by >> > then, >> > > we should immediately hold a 3 day vote by the Mahout committers to >> > conclude >> > > Saturday March 20 at noon PDT. Since this is a procedural vote, a >> > majority >> > > vote of committers will suffice for election and only positive votes >> for >> > a >> > > properly nominated candidate will be considered. >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Grant Ingersoll < >> gsing...@apache.org >> > >wrote: >> > > >> > >> >> > >> OK, seems I was wrong on this and that we do need to nominate/elect >> > someone >> > >> and make it part of the resolution. Please start a separate thread >> > with >> > >> [NOMINATION] XXXXX as the subject line. Please note, I am not >> > interested in >> > >> being the PMC Chair at this point, so I will not accept a nomination. >> > >> > >> > >> > >