>>>>> "JCL" == J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JCL> Ergo, if a given list is configured to do reply-To munging
JCL> and it receives a message with Reply-To set, then it makes
JCL> sense to _ADD_ the list's address to the Reply-To: header if
JCL> present, rather than replacing it.
VM/XEmacs does the right thing too, with both Reply-To: that contains
multiple addresses, and multiple Reply-To: headers in the original
message.
I'll rework the munging code for the next alpha to augment the header
instead of replacing it. It would be easier to simply add a new
Reply-To: header. Can you guys check to see if multiple Reply-To:
headers are honored too?
-Barry
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
