>>>>> "JCL" == J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JCL> If I'm reading it correctly, multiple Reply-To headers
JCL> violates RFC 2822. The fact that VM supports it is fine, but
JCL> that doesn't mean Mailman should emit it.
You're right of course, see section 3.6:
Field Min number Max number Notes
reply-to 0 1
(I'm battling a cold and lack of sleep so apologies for having been
lazy about looking it up.)
JCL> Note: Need to make sure you do duplicate collapsing of the
JCL> Reply-To header in case the poster has already set Reply-To
JCL> to the list in effort to nix CC: dupes.
Are you suggesting that we collapse Reply-To: even if we don't add one
ourselves? I would think that we should only collapse if we're adding
a value.
-Barry
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
