Peter W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I guess I was a little afraid that MTA's would get lost matching up
>> separately-issued RCPT TO: and OVRD commands that were supposed to
>> function as logical pairs.
>
> Yes, that makes sense. But couldn't that be clarified in the new
> RFC/draft?
yes, it might even be obeyed :) but yes.
> A couple problems I see with that:
>
> 1) MTAs would have to be 100% uniform in the way they constructed
> VERP return paths, or apps like mailman would not be able to use them
>
> 2) this takes aways some flexibility from the sending MTA, which
> currently has the flexibility to deal with VERP in arbitrarily
> complex ways...
Okay, I agree, your way is better. Let's make it as simple as possible:
HELO shrek.org
250 smtp.aol.com Hello shrek.org [123.45.6.7], glad to see you.
MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender ok
RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient ok
VERP FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender ok
RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient ok
VERP FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender ok
DATA
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
