On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 04:00:11AM -0800, Dan Mick wrote: > A thing I hadn't thought about: if the local MTA senses that the remote > MTA *also* supports XVERP, it doesn't have to do the expansion > itself; it can simply send on one XVERP-ed multirecipient message, > and let the final MTA handle the envelope multiplication.
Which would be the True Win... but *absolutely requires* an RFC for verp syntax, which will have to be extensible. No, really. It will. Take my word for it. :-) *I* think that sending a VERP template, with a spot marked for the destination MTA to put the destination email address, would be the most flexible approach. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 "If you don't have a dream; how're you gonna have a dream come true?" -- Captain Sensible, The Damned (from South Pacific's "Happy Talk") _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
