On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 20:07, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > Sorry my response is slow :-)
No worries! > Yeah, I think I can contribute 2.2 while you are at 3.0. Looking back > the design notes, we have already some of 2.2 features in 2.1.6. > http://zope.org/Members/bwarsaw/MailmanDesignNotes/MailmanTwoDotTwo > > May be we can go forward to requirement of Python 2.4 because CJK codecs > are integreted there. I have no problems requiring Python 2.4 for Mailman 2.2, although I would like to get some feedback from the community before we decide for sure. I wouldn't be opposed to requiring at least Python 2.3, but I definitely think we should drop support for earlier Pythons since nothing earlier than 2.3 is being maintained any more. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
