On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:41:42AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Bob Puff wrote: > > > I think the majority of MM users will be simply using the RPM that comes > > with > > their distro, and there is a real benefit to stuff working right "out of the > > box". This includes the Archiving functions. > > > > Its great to have options, and giving a list of possible alternatives for > > users is excellent, but I think releasing MM 3 without -any- archiver is a > > down-grade from the current MM 2.x. > > In the Debian world we would do something like this: > > Package: mailman3 > Depends: mailman3-archiver-default | mailman3-archiver > > Package: mailman3-archiver-default > Depends: mailman3-archiver-hyperkitty > > Package: mailman3-archiver-hyperkitty > Provides: mailman3-archiver > > Is something like that not possible in the RPM world? > Not sure what the | syntax is so it may not be. But what we might do would be have a virtual provide.
Package mailman3 Requires: mailman3-archiver Package: mailman3-archiver-hyperkitty Provides: mailman3-archiver Package: mailman3-archiver-pipermail-eeewwww Provides: mailman3-archiver -Toshio
pgp0vjVOu05cd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
