On Jul 13, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >Barry Warsaw writes: > > > The question is whether we want to support running the core without > > having this user service available, i.e. in standalone mode. Are > > we going to require that this service be running in order to run > > the core? I think we shouldn't be so strict. > >But *some* user service needs to be available.
Agreed, but my question is whether the limited user manager service that the core currently provides is enough for standalone deployments where all the fancy stuff about Facebook ids and reputations doesn't matter. I have no problem with providing a more limited set of functionality in that case (i.e. "just the messages, ma'am"[*]). Cheers, -Barry [*] w/apologies to Jack Webb/Joe Friday, who never actually uttered that paraphrase exactly. http://www.snopes.com/radiotv/tv/dragnet.asp
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
