I promise to try and do better proof-reading for the emails I post. To correct how my earlier email reads, please interpret the question I asked as:
..what if we could invite/reach out to administrators who've chosen to host their apache project-lists using 'mod_mbox approach' to consider MM3 as a replacement solution? With any list-admins among those projects tying the projects' mbox files into a mailman page, we'd achieve more users trying mailman, was my only take-away point for that, I guess. To move into GSOC, I'd like some information on "RSS and/or NNTP access to Mailman archives." - and, more specifically for RSS, is displaying an mbox file being achieved anywhere on-line using mm3 facilities (ie: hyperkitty + django templates?) - I assume yes per mention of the live MM3 instance with 2500 users' existence, but perhaps that only runs the email part and its archives are not web-exposed via archive-interface- was the URL for it mentioned when it was learned of during pycon? Thanks for your help and sharing more about this functionality! Chris On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Chris Cargile <follybeach...@gmail.com>wrote: > A while back, I proposed contributing to MM3 in the area of archive > searching and MM2 backwards -compatibility and am considering further, > still: > > change: ... what if we could invite/reach out to administrators who've > chosen to use (on on mod_mbox approach) to consider MM3 as a replacement > solution? This would allow us to grow the base of users by attracting an > audience potentially with the resources to provide some nice > observations,contributions to MM3's project I'd guess, maybe? > > MM3 marketing/capture strategies to rest - to return to researching MM3 > alternatives, I evaluate Apache's alternatives as: > - mail-archive.com, markmail (good but kinda proprietary, right?); > - marc (monolithic?); > - and Apache's mod_mbox (GSOC project - 2005) > > To expand more, maybe it is required for apache projects to host/use > mod_mbox and others, but I am wondering, then, is mail-archive.com really > the likely system of choice used in *lots* projects due to > searchable-archives function? Can I say 'yay' for up-voting (again) the > search function and express a personal appeal towards the ideas @ GSOC > ideas (#1,#2 <http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Google+Summer+of+Code+2013> > ) > > I'm quite glad the activity is continuing here! > Chris > _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9