On Jul 31, 2013, at 06:17 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >I'm excited to see this work, Abhilash!
Me too! >On 07/31/2013 02:43 AM, Abhilash Raj wrote: >> * Signature verification using `python-gnupg` was a PITA to me for >> sometime. The way it accepts the string and signature for detached >> signature is not documented at all and is converse of what I could think >> of. It just occurred to me to try out the other possibility which turned >> out to be the right way. > >have you reported this as a bug to the python-gnupg folks? I imagine a >patch to improve their documentation would be welcomed. I'm not so sure about the "not documented at all" part. http://pythonhosted.org/python-gnupg/#verification I'm using verify_file() in another project: http://tinyurl.com/mulvhql but I agree it's not the most convenient API. Although the VCS for the upstream code is not publicly available, their issue tracker is: https://code.google.com/p/python-gnupg/issues/list and I've found them to be pretty good about responding to bugs and feature requests. Cheers, -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
