On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Franck Martin <fra...@peachymango.org> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jim Popovitch" <jim...@gmail.com>
>> To: Mailman-Developers@python.org
>> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2013 11:49:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman DMARC Support (it's not what you   
>>  think!)
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Franck Martin <fra...@peachymango.org> wrote:
>> > To be noted, the procedure, in this patch, to find the policy record in the
>> > DNS, is not in line with the best current practice specified in the DMARC
>> > spec, far from it.
>>
>> Care to offer some insight?
>
> As they say at IETF: Read the spec! :P

Well, as they say in production environments, I'll wait for the final cut.  ;-)

>>
>> > Also, what about p=quarantine?
>>
>> I think that should be treated the same as p=reject.  Don't send me
>> your junk for storage!  :-)
>>
>
> Please amend the patch to reflect it.

Done.  Rev 1380.

-Jim P.
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

Reply via email to