Franck Martin writes: > As they say at IETF: Read the spec! :P
I have (probably three times carefully by now), and I still can't understand why you think DMARC makes any sense at all for mailing lists. (I have no trouble at all understanding why Citibank thinks it's great. But that's a completely different use-case.) It might help if you gave us the annotated version of what you do like about it, instead of telling us that everything we've been doing for 20 years is wrong, and that we're crazy to object to the violation of the most fundamental and ancient email RFC (not to mention violating copyright law in every Berne Convention signatory) by corrupting the authorship information of each post we process. As Jim says, the only real hope mailing lists have is some kind of digital signature protocol that allows the list to testify to having performed its own authenticity checks before forwarding the post. Steve _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
