You are really mixing everything... Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question.
> On May 16, 2014, at 20:09, "John Levine" <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > > In article <1856298671.144791.1400292991012.javamail.zim...@peachymango.org> > you write: >> The trouble with .invalid is that it is a domain that do not accept emails. >> Therefore why should you accept emails from a domain >> that does not allow you to reply to it? >> >> It is bound in the future to create issues when people move to more >> serious/ubiquitous domain reputation schemes. > > Everyone I know who's tried to do spam filtering by SMTP callbacks to > verify sender addresses has stopped, for the dual reasons that it > doesn't work, and it's abusive. I can't imagine why you think people > are likely to resume using it. Considering the amount of mail I get > with non-replyable addresses like donotre...@bigbank.com, I'm not the > only person who doesn't think this is a problem. > > Or if they do, it's easy enough to add domain suffixes that satisfy > whatever even more broken reputation scheme we need to defeat. > > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-Developers mailing list > Mailman-Developers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers > Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 > Searchable Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/franck%40peachymango.org > > Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
