Barry Warsaw writes: > On Feb 20, 2015, at 07:25 PM, Andrew Stuart wrote: > > >It’s workable as a part of the auth proxy but feels like it would fit better > >in the Mailman core database since the data is so tightly bound to Mailman > >resources. It’ll need an effective replication mechanism to ensure > >consistency with Mailman which is a challenge I’m not relishing solving. > > Do you think this has to be integrated into the core for 3.0? I'd still > prefer to keep it separate for better experimentation and testing. If the > design and API proves stable, then perhaps it'll make sense to integrate it > with the core for 3.1.
I don't which way this argues, but Mailman 3 already needs "effective replication mechanisms" because Postorius and HyperKitty both add to the basic database schema. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
