On 2/23/2015 8:08 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Andrew Stuart writes:

  > I am currently associating users, not addresses with these
  > permissions, so your suggestion is compatible with my stuff.

+1 on associating users with permissions (plus the validation Barry
recommends).

  > site owner does sound more appropriate than server owner.

Users think of "site" as being nearly synonymous with "domain",
though.  I don't think we should use "site" in a different way, that
would confuse them.

There should be a way to contact the actual operator of the host,
which I think of as "hostmaster" or "server owner".

Steve

My .0002 cents. :)

In a previous message, the thought of making Mailman usable in an enterprise environment was brought up. A good idea. Also, I believe I remember a goal for Mailman v3 was to have one instance of Mailman be able to host lists for multiple domains. Given that information and information from Andrew and Stephen, there are several different layers of "ownership". Thinking about it a little, I see:

"Owner"                    Description
------------                    --------------------------
List Owner                 can administer a list
Server Owner can administer all lists on one server (server may host multiple domains) Site Owner can administer for all lists at a site (site has multiple servers) (site is a physical location) Domain Owner can administer for all lists for a domain (domains may be hosted on multiple servers possibly across multiple sites)

Note: if site is considered a physical location, then an additional owner permission may be "Host Owner" for all their sites at different locations.

Nailing down a good permissions structure is very important if Mailman is to be used in the enterprise, both in a large organization or by a hosting company (e.g. Rackspace, etc.).

Better people than I can come up with a better solution than my quick thought. I do think it is important that once you get past the "List Owner" level of permissions, there is potential interaction between "Server Owner", "Site Owner", and "Domain Owner". This also points to a need for a robust authentication system that can handle multiple ways to authenticate the various owners.

Well, probably in over my head again.

Thanks,
Chris


_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
  • R... Florian Fuchs
    • ... Andrew Stuart
      • ... Barry Warsaw
        • ... Stephen J. Turnbull
        • ... Andrew Stuart
          • ... Stephen J. Turnbull
            • ... Andrew Stuart
              • ... Ian Eiloart
              • ... Barry Warsaw
          • ... Stephen J. Turnbull
            • ... Chris Nulk
              • ... Barry Warsaw
          • ... Andrew Stuart
            • ... Barry Warsaw
              • ... Ankush Sharma B.Tech. Electronics Engg, IIT(BHU), Varanasi (U.P.), INDIA
              • ... Terri Oda
              • ... Ankush Sharma B.Tech. Electronics Engg, IIT(BHU), Varanasi (U.P.), INDIA
              • ... Terri Oda
              • ... Ankush Sharma B.Tech. Electronics Engg, IIT(BHU), Varanasi (U.P.), INDIA
              • ... Stephen J. Turnbull
              • ... Terri Oda

Reply via email to