On Oct 9, 2017, at 03:55, Stephen J. Turnbull <turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: > > Do we need to worry about current distros?
Probably not, as you point out. > We're still seeing plenty of questions about new installations of > Mailman 2 on mailman-users. Mailman 3 is still a double-diamond > application. As I wrote in a different thread, I don't think Mailman > 3 is going to be ready for the mom & pop listowner for a while. If > versions of Centos (or whatever) don't support Python 3 by then, "let > them run containers". :-) Yep, and we have a good container story now, so I think that’s entirely viable. There is work being done on Debian packaging for MM3 and I think having everything on Python 3 should make that story better too. (Debian unstable does have Python3 Django). -Barry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
