On Thursday 01 November 2001 10:00, J C Lawrence wrote:

> > Based on a little experiment it seem that mail (unix mail
> > command), kmail, and outlook express do not.
>
> I can't comment on Outlook.  The other's you listed do generate
> correct In-Reply-To: headers.
>
Are you sure? Look at the following reply generated by replying to a mail 
send by a local user:
---
>From root  Fri Nov  2 10:27:14 2001
Return-Path: <root>
Received: (from root@localhost)
        by tanya.oslo.seres.pgs.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA11389;
        Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:27:14 +0100
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:27:14 +0100
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: test
 
reply
which headers are added?
---
No In-Reply-To: header here. The mail client on this linux box is mail (good 
old mail, which does not honour the -V or --version option)

By the way, your messages do not thread in the mailman user maillist archive. 
Which MUA are you using?

-- 
Regards,

Lucas Hofman
PGS Research                                    work: +47 67514059
PO Box 354                                       fax: +47 67526640
N-1326 Lysaker, Norway                          home: +47 67581373




------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users

Reply via email to