On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 22:36:45 -0500 Tom Neff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite the contrary, RFC2369 says > Implementing these fields will be optional. > Therefore, by adding a manager's option for those headers instead of > trying to force them on everyone, Mailman 2.1 has finally been brought > into RFC2369 compliance. Nope. The RFC states that conformant systems may or may not implement the various headers (ie optional), it does not state that any given system that supports those headers must also allow them to be disabled. Mailman was conformant previously and now with the config option (which I greatly regret) is still conformant. There has been no change in that regard. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
