What is wrong with the mailman authors making their product superior enough to compensate for Microdummies poor programing and faulty RFC interpretation?
What is wrong with this idea, is that it means Mailman is going against the RFC that it currently obeys, to work with something that is broken.
What should happen is get the broken package fixed, rather than make a unbroken package broken.
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe or change your options at http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
