I wouldn't say that "HTML is not well supported". The built-in pipermail archiver isn't so great with HTML, but this can be remedied. Mailman itself does a pretty reasonable job with regards to the messages as they are actually sent out, considering just how difficult various programs make this process.
**Compared to YahooGroups** it's not well supported. If you allow HTML the digests are a challenge for many e-mail programs. There is apparently no way to strip the html and send plain text digests, and selecting plain digest results in not getting some posts at all. It would also be nice to be able to reject some attachments and still allow html.
None of this is to say I don't like or use Mailman - I'm simply trying to give a comparison to Y!G.
<>< Paul
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
