Charles
As a matter of courtesy, when replying to question posted to the list by somebody, I always respond to the individual poster with a copy for information to the list so that the discussion is available to other subscribers and within the list archives.
I have no objection to you having a spam management policy which may trap and even discard my response to you, even though you have actively solicited that message from me. That is your valid choice. What I object to is my inbox being further cluttered with messages, from spam management software telling me I have to fill in its form if I wish to communicate with this or that person. In my view such software just adds to the spam we are all suffering from.
Richard
On 21 Aug 2004, at 05:45, Charles Mikecz Vamossy wrote:
Richard - I am sorry your note got caught up in my ISP's "crap" software. Actually, I had no idea that you were going to send me a direct response to a question I posed to a list. Had I known that, I would not have bothered to sign up. I don't know if it was Mailman or you, yourself, who decided to put your email address in the "from" field", but I signed up for a daily digest form, mailed firectly from the list and not all this "crap" - as you call it.
Charles
-----Original Message----- From: Richard Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Aug 20, 2004 4:17 PM To: Charles Mikecz Vamossy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] New user - Mailman question
On 20 Aug 2004, at 20:39, Charles Mikecz Vamossy wrote:
HI, I am a new member of the list and a list administrator responsible for two lists. Frankly I am struggling with some of the features and functions and I thought I would ask "my elders" for some guidance.
Our lists are very simple: we distribute weekly information to members about our organization's programs. Our members sign themselves up automatically, receive a confirmation request and when they respond, they get a welcome letter. Only two people (who are also the administrators) can send postings. Letters sent by other members and non-members should be rejected automatically, with an explanation. (They can write to our organization directly...)
The problem is that non-members have apparently written postings and we, laboring under the impression that if we do nothing, their letters will get deleted, did in fact do nothing - and the letters appeared on the list. Apparently, we are told by the folks who run the lists for us, there is a "set period of quarantine", and when that expires, the letters are treated as approved. This is news to us, and we are unable to find any reference to it in any documentation.
No version of MM since I started using it with version 2.0.3 has behaved this way so it is news to me too. Held postings will be held indefinitely with MM sender regular reminders to the list admins that there are held postings.
You do not say what version of MM you are running (or rather is being run on your behalf). If it is MM 2.1.x you should be able to use the Privacy options on the web admin GUI senders filter page for the list to arrange for postings from anyone other than your nominated list posters automatically rejected or discarded. Presumably you have already set moderation on for all your subscribers.
Is it possible someone with list admin access approved the postings and the explanation you have received is just trying to explain that away by positing some non-existent MM feature?
Can you help us and tell us where to find information on this? Are there any parameters we can set differently? Is there anyone out there with a similar problem and how do you handle it?
many thanks in advance
Charles
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
