On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 10:29 -0700, John W. Baxter wrote: > On 4/28/06 6:06 AM, "Barry Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 22:46 -0500, Brad Knowles wrote: > > > >> If the previous value of the "Sender:" field is being lost, then > >> that should be corrected. At the very least, the value should be > >> saved in an "Old-Sender:" or "Previous-Sender:" or some other > >> suitable renamed sender field. > > > > Probably Original-Sender: > > Probably, indeed. But what happens if that header was already "taken" in > the process that brought the message to mailman for distribution to the > list? > > (As usual, I have only questions, not answers.)
Original-Original-Sender: (and so on, and so on... :) -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
