Oliver Schulze L. wrote: > >I'm a litle late to the FHS discusion, do you know why the FHS patch >from RH was not accepted? >http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers@python.org/msg08110.html
At the time John developed the patch, Tokio was pretty much the only person actively working on the 2.1.x branch. The necessary 'additional testing' mentioned in the above referenced thread was not done for lack of resources. This doesn't mean the patch is dead - it is still potentially a candidate for 2.2. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
