Mark Sapiro wrote: > At the time John developed the patch, Tokio was pretty much the only > person actively working on the 2.1.x branch. The necessary 'additional > testing' mentioned in the above referenced thread was not done for > lack of resources. This doesn't mean the patch is dead - it is still > potentially a candidate for 2.2. I understand. Maybe the patch can be included (with a big warning) in the next alpha release of mailman 2.1.x so that people can test it. I think that if the patch does not change the behavior of the configure script until it is told to do so, it can be a nice addition to mailman. Because people who does not use it, won't be affected.
Personally, I can test on RH Linux, from RH9 to RHEL 2.1/3/4 Thanks Oliver -- Oliver Schulze L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
